The 2005 and 2015 education goals,
rich countries would need to provide $5.6 bn per year.
That’s less than three days of global military
spending, and about the same as what American parents
spend on Barbie dolls for their daughters. Since 2000,
the international community, which has promised to co-finance
the Millennium Development Goal effort, has repeatedly
failed to find adequate funds for poor countries that
are ready to implement national plans to achieve education
for all. The nine countries in this study alone face
a financing gap of about USD $1bn per year.9 until the
financing gap is closed; the gender gap cannot be closed
either.
5) A global initiative for the education
goals
Aid not only needs to be increased,
it needs to be intelligently targeted towards countries
that face the greatest numerical and financial challenges
in attaining the 2005 and 2015 goals, and whose
Governments show real and demonstrated commitment to
redressing gender inequalities. Firm, long-term financial
aid is required in order for governments to be able
to commit external resources to meet salary costs and
other recurrent expenditures. The Global Campaign for
Education is calling for the implementation of a global
financing framework for basic education, in order to
channel increased aid to the countries that are most
in need of additional
Resources and have good policies in place for meeting
the 2005 and 2015 education goals. The Fast Track Initiative
(FTI), endorsed last year by the G7 leaders, the World
Bank, UNESCO and UNICEF, provides a starting point.
The FTI could be enormously helpful in accelerating
progress towards the 2005 and 2015 targets, by guaranteeing
the long-term predictable financing that governments
need in order to provide free and universal access,
and to
Achieve minimum quality levels in all schools. However,
the FTI’s impact on the 2005 goal will be limited
unless it includes funding for subsidy programmes to
get girls into school. Donors must
Also agree a timetable for expanding FTI entry to more
countries, including those with the most out-of-school
girls and largest gender gaps.
We know what needs to be done to provide
all girls with their right to a basic education; we
know what it will cost. We also know what a high price
there is to be paid for failure. We must now mobilise
this ambition and all the available resources to implement
and achieve what we know to be right.
“I didn’t go to school
because I had so much work at home. Here at school,
I am learning so much. I am learning to think well of
myself. I want to become a teacher, so that I can make
others feel like me now.”
– SANGEETA, 16, INDIA.
Notes
1 Bicego G., and O. Ahmad 1996, Infant and Child Mortality,
Demographic and Health
Surveys Comparative Studies no. 20. Calverton, Maryland:
Macro International Inc.
2 World Bank 2002, HIV-AIDS and Education: A window
of hope. Washington, D.C.: World
Bank.
3 Smith, L. C., and L. Haddad 2000, Explaining Child
Malnutrition in Developing Countries: A
Cross Country Analysis. IFPRI Research Report. No.111.
Washington, D.C.: International
Food Policy Research Institute.
4 Coombe, C., and M. Kelly 2001, ‘Education as
a Vehicle for Combating HIV/AIDS.’
UNESCO Prospects XXXI (3): pp.435-45.
5 Vandemoortele, J. 2002, ‘Are the MDGs Feasible?’,
UNDP Bureau for Development Policy,
processed July.
6 UNDP and UNICEF 2002, The Millennium Development Goals
in Africa. Report prepared in
June at the request of the G8 Personal Representatives
for Africa.
7 Vandemoortele, op. cit.
8 UNESCO 2002, Global EFA Monitoring Report. New York:
UNESCO.
9 World Bank 2002, A Chance for Every Child. Washington,
D.C.: World Bank.
MEDIA BRIEF
A Fair Chance
ATTAINING GENDER EQUALITY IN BASIC EDUCATION BY 2005
Global Campaign for Education
www.campaignforeducation.org
APRIL 2003
65 million girls are missing
Getting girls into school means the difference between
life and death for millions. Babies born to mothers
without formal education are at least twice as likely
to suffer from malnutrition, or die before the age of
five, than those babies born to mothers who completed
primary school.1 Even one or two years of schooling
for mothers cuts child deaths by 15 per cent.2 Women’s
education does more to reduce malnutrition than anything
else, including increased food availability.3 It is
one of the most
Effective ways to fight the spread of HIV-AIDS.4
Yet 65 million girls are being denied their right to
education. That’s as many as all of the school-age
girls in North America and Europe. And far too little
is being done about it. At the UN Millennium Summit
in 2000, world leaders agreed to get as many girls as
boys do into primary and secondary classrooms by 2005.
Governments also promised to ensure that by 2015, all
girls and boys complete primary education. The UN itself
acknowledges that without success on the education goals,
there is little prospect of achieving the other Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) for halving poverty by 2015.
Yet, on current trends, girls’ enrolment won’t
catch up with boys’ until 2025.5 and unless progress
is accelerated, Africa won’t get all of its girls
and boys into primary school until 2100.6
Some 88 countries need to dramatically accelerate progress
for the 2005 target to be met. Clearly, a massive effort
will be needed in order to avoid an outright failure.
Yet even though 2005 is less than two years away, no
country is so far off track that it cannot eliminate
gender gaps in rural and urban primary and secondary
school intake rates by 2005. The next challenge is to
ensure that completion rates between boys and girls
are equalised by 2010. Eliminating gender gaps in rural
and urban primary school intake is a minimum threshold
that must be achieved by 2005. If this timeline is allowed
to slip, it will become impossible to achieve universal
primary education (UPE) by 2015. And, as UNDP has warned,
if we fail to achieve UPE by 2015, the already uncertain
prospects of attaining the other MDGs will dwindle beyond
the vanishing point.7 But some countries, including
a few of the poorest in the world, are already making
the required effort – and winning. Bangladesh,
for example, has raised girls’ secondary enrolment
rate from 13 per cent to 56 per cent in 10 years.8 New
research by the GCE analyses the factors behind their
success. The study shows that girls’ enrolments
could grow at the rate required to reach the targets,
if all poor countries made basic education free and
introduced targeted programmes to help girls in the
poorest families and schools; and if all rich countries
kept their promise to increase their aid to education.
A primer for action
Achieving gender equality throughout the education and
training system must be accorded the highest priority.
It should therefore be a central plank of the manifesto
of every political party, a key goal in donor Country
Assistance Strategies and Poverty Reduction Strategy
Papers, and the top priority for every Minister of Education.
Clear, time-bound targets must be backed up by the necessary
commitment of resources and proper management systems
with the power and authority to ensure that every education
manager, right through to every classroom teacher, takes
the gender targets very seriously.
2
A Fair Chance
ATTAINING GENDER EQUALITY IN BASIC
EDUCATION BY 2005
A comprehensive strategy for achieving gender equality
in education should include the following actions by
governments and donors:
1) End the education queue
There are only a few developing countries in which affluent
males have not already achieved universal primary education.
There are only a few developing countries in which poor,
rural girls are even close to achieving the same. In
India, for example, nearly a third of rural girls have
never been to school, and in Ethiopia, the figure climbs
to almost two-thirds. Gender gaps are often greatest
in countries where overall net enrolments are low. By
failing to increase access so that there are enough
free school places to accommodate all of the boys and
all of the girls, governments create an education queue
in which the poorest and least privileged groups, including
girls, are almost certain to come last. The following
steps are needed to get rid of this queue: _ Build enough
schools and hire enough teachers to guarantee that all
communities are served by a school within safe walking
distance for girls. _ Remove school fees, which guarantee
the continuing exclusion of poor rural girls. When parents
can only afford to keep one child in school, daughters
usually lose out. By contrast, in Uganda,
Following the introduction of free primary education,
the number of girls enrolled increased from 1.4 million
in 1996, to 3 million in 1999, and girls’ share
in total enrolment has steadily grown. _ Expand ‘bridging’
schemes developed by NGOs to attract hard-to-reach children
into the school system.
_ To avoid recreating the queue at secondary level,
governments must plan to rapidly extend free and universal
access to secondary schools. Currently, only one in
five girls in Africa and two in five girls
In South and West Asia, get the chance to go to secondary
school.
2) Offer extra help for poor families
to keep girls in school
Extra assistance, such as a free school
meal, or stipends linked to regular attendance, helps
poor families keep girls in school for longer. It is
also an inexpensive and effective way to redistribute
resources towards poor communities, since a relatively
small upfront investment by governments enables poor
girls to acquire a lifelong asset that allows them to
escape the poverty trap. In Bangladesh, districts where
secondary school bursaries were introduced experienced
a sharp decrease in child marriages, as well as soaring
girls’ enrolments.
3) Launch a rescue plan for schools
in poor communities
Parents withdraw girls from school
if they perceive that their daughters are not learning
anything; or worse, that they are vulnerable to abuse,
attack and humiliation on school grounds. Yet many schools
in poor, rural areas (and urban slums) lack even the
basics needed to function. They frequently have far
fewer resources, offer fewer hours of instruction, and
attain far worse results, than schools in more
Affluent areas. All schools need a trained, motivated
teacher who turns up every day to teach, and enough
books and desks to go around. Construction of safe and
private toilet facilities for girls should be mandatory.
Strong sanctions against the sexual abuse and harassment
of girl pupils must be enacted
And enforced. A first priority should be improving the
status, pay and support of teachers, especially those
teachers posted to rural or ‘difficult’
areas.
4) Invest more in girls
Countries that have achieved success in girls’
schooling are ones that have dramatically increased
their own spending on basic education to as much as
20 per cent of their budget, or 3 per cent of their
GDP. Yet even at this high level of government commitment,
low-income countries will still need a substantial increase
in aid and debt relief. To meet 3
GCE South Africa
Although it may appear that the enrolment
situation in South Africa is not as bad as the rest
of the world. The main concern is the out come of the
gender differences than the enrolment issue. One of
the main problems that have been identified as the contributing
factor is that South Africa has a high teenage pregnancy
rate which interrupts the girls education. After giving
birth many girls don’t go back to school. This
is just one of the reasons for the high drop out rate
of girls. This issue is being investigated further.
GCE is an initiative to highlight such
problems in the country along with other issue such
as
Free education and other issues. This years campaign
is highlighting the main concerns that the people of
South Africa are facing concerning their girl children
hence this years slogan: “ hands up for girls’
education”
|